CRLP Guidance and Training for Drafters / Lesson

Definitions, Deeming, and Clear Labels

Definitions are operative structures, not just labels, and naming choices help the drafter see what kind of legal work a provision is doing.

Switch to a cleaner briefing layout or print a copy for offline reading.

In this lesson

  • distinguish exhaustive and non-exhaustive definitions
  • recognise deeming and indirect definitions as operative legal structures
  • use labels to sharpen drafting analysis rather than decorate it

Definitions do more than help the reader. They allocate legal meaning.

An exhaustive definition tells the reader what counts as the defined term and closes the set.

An enlarging definition brings listed things within the term without necessarily closing the set.

That is the practical contrast between means and includes. It is not just a drafting preference. It is a difference in legal effect.

If a definition says that “agriculture includes aquaculture”, it tells the reader that aquaculture falls within the term, while leaving open that other things may also do so. If it says that “aquaculture means fish-farming and shellfish-farming”, it identifies the term as exhausted by that content.

Deeming provisions belong in the same family

Provisions stating that something is to be treated as something else, or that one thing counts as another, are also constitutive devices.

They assign legal meaning or legal status. They are not merely descriptive.

That is why definitions, deeming provisions, and similar clauses should be analysed as operative structures within the law.

Definitions can appear outside a definition section

Some provisions perform definitional work even though they are not set out as stand-alone definitions.

Examples include:

  • “A person who drives (a ‘driver’) …”
  • “For the purposes of this Part, a farmer is a person who works in agriculture.”

The same questions still apply. Is the effect exhaustive? Is it enlarging? Is it deeming? The drafting location has changed, but the legal task has not.

Open-ended

“Agriculture” includes aquaculture.

Exhaustive

“Aquaculture” means fish-farming and shellfish-farming.

Labels improve analysis when they mark real distinctions

Naming matters because it helps the drafter notice what kind of thing is under discussion.

The difference between a provision, an enactment, an instrument, a paragraph, a definition, and a condition is not empty terminology. Those labels help the drafter avoid running unlike things together.

The same is true inside clauses. Seeing that includes is performing definitional work is useful because it changes how the sentence should be understood.

Definitions are not harmless ornament

A definition can widen, narrow, or redirect the whole operation of an Act. A deeming provision can fix a legal result that would not otherwise follow. A label can expose whether the drafter is dealing with a rule of conduct, a rule of law, or a linked procedural device.

That is why these clauses should be drafted with the same care as any operative provision.

Self-check

Use these prompts to test whether the drafting point is clear before you move on.

1Why is the distinction between “means” and “includes” important?

Because it affects legal effect. “Means” is normally exhaustive, while “includes” normally enlarges without closing the set.

2Why should a drafter care about labels and naming?

Because good labels reveal real distinctions. They help the drafter see what kind of legal work a provision is doing and choose structure accordingly.